A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84
BACKGROUND: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, and there is a critical need for a nuanced understanding of how AI is reshaping teaching, learning, and educational practice in medical education. This review aimed to map the literature regarding AI applications in medical education, core areas of findings, potential candidates for formal systematic review and gaps for future research. METHODS: This rapid scoping review, conducted over 16 weeks, employed Arksey and O'M
Record details
Published: 29 February 2024
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots
OpenAlex · 22 January 2024
The application of large language models in medicine: A scoping review
OpenAlex · 23 April 2024
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
OpenAlex · 31 May 2024
Improving health literacy using the power of digital communications to achieve better health outcomes for patients and practitioners
OpenAlex · 17 November 2023
Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings
OpenAlex · 7 July 2023
Artificial intelligence in healthcare and education
OpenAlex · 26 May 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 February 2024), “A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84,” evidence record 9486, https://ethics.ai/record/9486 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.