The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In
Record details
Published: 31 May 2024
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The evolving role of nursing informatics in the era of artificial intelligence
OpenAlex · 10 January 2025
Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Policy Statement
OpenAlex · 20 January 2026
Beyond Symbolic Control: Societal Consequences of AI-Driven Workforce Displacement and the Imperative for Genuine Human Oversight Architectures
arXiv · 31 March 2026
Health System Scale Semantic Search Across Unstructured Clinical Notes
arXiv · 28 April 2026
AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China
arXiv · 30 May 2026
PySynthea: A Python-Native Framework for Scalable Synthetic Healthcare Data Generation
arXiv · 2 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (31 May 2024), “The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making,” evidence record 9517, https://ethics.ai/record/9517 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.