Burden of disease scenarios for 204 countries and territories, 2022–2050: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
BACKGROUND: Future trends in disease burden and drivers of health are of great interest to policy makers and the public at large. This information can be used for policy and long-term health investment, planning, and prioritisation. We have expanded and improved upon previous forecasts produced as part of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) and provide a reference forecast (the most likely future), and alternative scenarios assessing disease burden trajectories
Record details
Published: 1 May 2024
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Physiological and Semantic Patterns in Medical Teams Using an Intelligent Tutoring System
arXiv · 31 March 2026
Diagnosing and Mitigating Thinking Collapse in On-Policy Self-Distillation
arXiv cs.LG · 12 July 2026
From Siloed Algorithms to Compliance-First Agentic Platforms: A Multi-Layered Architecture for Hospital AI Systems
arXiv · 6 August 2026
A governance model for the application of AI in health care
OpenAlex · 10 October 2019
FDA-ARGOS is a database with public quality-controlled reference genomes for diagnostic use and regulatory science
OpenAlex · 25 July 2019
Physicians’ Perceptions of Chatbots in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
OpenAlex · 9 February 2019
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 May 2024), “Burden of disease scenarios for 204 countries and territories, 2022–2050: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” evidence record 9466, https://ethics.ai/record/9466 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.