Physicians’ Perceptions of Chatbots in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey
BACKGROUND: Many potential benefits for the uses of chatbots within the context of health care have been theorized, such as improved patient education and treatment compliance. However, little is known about the perspectives of practicing medical physicians on the use of chatbots in health care, even though these individuals are the traditional benchmark of proper patient care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of physicians regarding the use of health care chatbots, inc
Record details
Published: 9 February 2019
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare · Children & education · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
FDA-ARGOS is a database with public quality-controlled reference genomes for diagnostic use and regulatory science
OpenAlex · 25 July 2019
A governance model for the application of AI in health care
OpenAlex · 10 October 2019
Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on Nursing Education: Scoping Review
OpenAlex · 12 January 2021
Effects of Sleep Quality on the Association between Problematic Mobile Phone Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Chinese College Students
OpenAlex · 14 February 2017
Digital Ageism: Challenges and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence for Older Adults
OpenAlex · 15 November 2021
Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD)
OpenAlex · 29 March 2016
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 February 2019), “Physicians’ Perceptions of Chatbots in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey,” evidence record 8536, https://ethics.ai/record/8536 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.