Physiological and Semantic Patterns in Medical Teams Using an Intelligent Tutoring System
Effective collaboration requires teams to manage complex cognitive and emotional states through Socially Shared Regulation of Learning (SSRL). Physiological synchrony (i.e., longitudinal alignment in physiological signals) can indicate these states, but is hard to interpret on its own. We investigate the physiological and conversational dynamics of four medical dyads diagnosing a virtual patient case using an intelligent tutoring system. Semantic shifts in dialogue were correlated with transient
Record details
Published: 31 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment · Healthcare · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Behavioural feasible set: Value alignment constraints on AI decision support
arXiv · 22 March 2026
Why AI Readiness Is an Organizational Learning Problem, Not a Technology Purchase
arXiv · 22 March 2026
Too much of a good thing? Entrepreneurial orientation and the non-linear governance effects of SaaS platforms
arXiv · 22 March 2026
Adoption and Effectiveness of AI-Based Anomaly Detection for Cross Provider Health Data Exchange
arXiv · 19 March 2026
AI Integrity: A New Paradigm for Verifiable AI Governance
arXiv · 13 April 2026
A Proposed Biomedical Data Policy Framework to Reduce Fragmentation, Improve Quality, and Incentivize Sharing in Indian Healthcare in the era of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health
arXiv · 13 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (31 March 2026), “Physiological and Semantic Patterns in Medical Teams Using an Intelligent Tutoring System,” evidence record 6535, https://ethics.ai/record/6535 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.