Using ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters
The appropriate recording and communication of clinical information between clinicians and patients are of paramount importance. Recently there has been a much-needed drive to improve the information that is shared with patients.1 However, the preparation of clinical letters can be time consuming. Although there has been an increase in the use of letter templates and voice recognition systems, with the aim of improving efficiency, novel technologies such as natural language processing (NLP) and
Record details
Published: 7 March 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation With ChatGPT and a Call for Papers
OpenAlex · 2 March 2023
The rise of <scp>ChatGPT</scp>: Exploring its potential in medical education
OpenAlex · 14 March 2023
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns
OpenAlex · 19 March 2023
Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing
OpenAlex · 19 February 2023
Diagnostic Accuracy of Differential-Diagnosis Lists Generated by Generative Pretrained Transformer 3 Chatbot for Clinical Vignettes with Common Chief Complaints: A Pilot Study
OpenAlex · 15 February 2023
Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
OpenAlex · 6 February 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 March 2023), “Using ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters,” evidence record 9389, https://ethics.ai/record/9389 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.