Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
The impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) on medical publishing practices is currently unknown. However, as our experiences underline, generative AI could have substantial ethical implications.
Record details
Published: 6 February 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
ChatGPT for healthcare services: An emerging stage for an innovative perspective
OpenAlex · 1 February 2023
Diagnostic Accuracy of Differential-Diagnosis Lists Generated by Generative Pretrained Transformer 3 Chatbot for Clinical Vignettes with Common Chief Complaints: A Pilot Study
OpenAlex · 15 February 2023
Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing
OpenAlex · 19 February 2023
The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation With ChatGPT and a Call for Papers
OpenAlex · 2 March 2023
Using ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters
OpenAlex · 7 March 2023
The rise of <scp>ChatGPT</scp>: Exploring its potential in medical education
OpenAlex · 14 March 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 February 2023), “Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing,” evidence record 9323, https://ethics.ai/record/9323 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.