War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education
Developments in the chatbot space have been accelerating at breakneck speed since late November 2022. Every day, there appears to be a plethora of news. A war of competitor chatbots is raging amidst an AI arms race and gold rush. These rapid developments impact higher education, as millions of students and academics have started using bots like ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard, Ernie and others for a large variety of purposes. In this article, we select some of the most promising chatbots in the English
Record details
Published: 24 April 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students
OpenAlex · 19 April 2023
ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies
OpenAlex · 8 May 2023
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
OpenAlex · 11 May 2023
Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 3 April 2023
A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research
OpenAlex · 27 March 2023
ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning
OpenAlex · 20 March 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (24 April 2023), “War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education,” evidence record 9379, https://ethics.ai/record/9379 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.