A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning
Abstract This study aims to develop an AI education policy for higher education by examining the perceptions and implications of text generative AI technologies. Data was collected from 457 students and 180 teachers and staff across various disciplines in Hong Kong universities, using both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Based on the findings, the study proposes an AI Ecological Education Policy Framework to address the multifaceted implications of AI integration in university tea
Record details
Published: 6 July 2023
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Students Know AI Should Not Replace Thinking, but How Do They Regulate It? The TACO Framework for Human-AI Cognitive Partnership
arXiv · 20 April 2026
Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning
OpenAlex · 6 November 2023
Impact of AI assistance on student agency
OpenAlex · 30 November 2023
Understanding students’ adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education: the role of anthropomorphism, trust, design novelty and institutional policy
OpenAlex · 16 February 2024
Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-Powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study
OpenAlex · 1 April 2024
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
OpenAlex · 31 May 2024
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (6 July 2023), “A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning,” evidence record 9280, https://ethics.ai/record/9280 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.