Self-Efficacy and Favorability Shape Learning from Tutoring Systems and Paper Practice
Motivational factors such as self-efficacy and how favorably students feel toward practice play a crucial role in shaping learning, particularly in technology-supported environments. Yet, educational interventions often overlook how these factors interact with practice format. This paper examines the influence of self-efficacy and favorability on learning outcomes across two common practice formats: paper-based and system-based tutoring practice. Using a counterbalanced within-subject design wit
Record details
Published: 16 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
NL2Scratch: An Executable Benchmark and Evaluation for Block-Based Programming
arXiv · 20 June 2026
Beyond Output Matching: Preserving Internal Geometry in NVFP4 LLM Distillation
arXiv · 4 June 2026
Commenting with Copilot: A Taxonomy and Multi-Year Analysis of Student Code-Generation Specifications
arXiv cs.CY · 14 July 2026
Conceptualizations of GenAI and students’ professionalization: Within the multi-layered environment of learning for higher education
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · 14 July 2026
Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay
HuggingFace Daily Papers · 15 July 2026
Cross-modal Affinity-aligned Multimodal Learning Analytics for Predicting Student Collaboration Satisfaction in Game-Based Learning
arXiv · 16 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 June 2026), “Self-Efficacy and Favorability Shape Learning from Tutoring Systems and Paper Practice,” evidence record 917, https://ethics.ai/record/917 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.