Cross-modal Affinity-aligned Multimodal Learning Analytics for Predicting Student Collaboration Satisfaction in Game-Based Learning
Collaborative game-based learning environments offer rich opportunities for small-group knowledge construction, yet automatically predicting student collaboration satisfaction remains challenging. A critical barrier is modality degradation: in educational deployments, individual modalities such as eye gaze exhibit inconsistent informativeness across student cohorts, causing implicit attention-based fusion to produce brittle multimodal representations. We propose the Affinity-Aligned Multimodal L
Record details
Published: 16 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Children & education · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Prober.ai: Gated Inquiry-Based Feedback via LLM-Constrained Personas for Argumentative Writing Development
arXiv · 7 May 2026
The Environmental Cost of LLMs in AIED: Reporting and Practices
arXiv · 3 May 2026
Beyond Output Matching: Preserving Internal Geometry in NVFP4 LLM Distillation
arXiv · 4 June 2026
Self-Efficacy and Favorability Shape Learning from Tutoring Systems and Paper Practice
arXiv · 16 June 2026
Cross-Course Generalizability of SRL-Aligned Predictive Models Using Digital Learning Traces
arXiv · 14 April 2026
SortingHat: Redefining Operating Systems Education with a Tailored Digital Teaching Assistant
arXiv · 13 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 May 2026), “Cross-modal Affinity-aligned Multimodal Learning Analytics for Predicting Student Collaboration Satisfaction in Game-Based Learning,” evidence record 4233, https://ethics.ai/record/4233 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.