Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers
Abstract Background Large language models such as ChatGPT can produce increasingly realistic text, with unknown information on the accuracy and integrity of using these models in scientific writing. Methods We gathered ten research abstracts from five high impact factor medical journals (n=50) and asked ChatGPT to generate research abstracts based on their titles and journals. We evaluated the abstracts using an artificial intelligence (AI) output detector, plagiarism detector, and had blinded h
Record details
Published: 27 December 2022
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Copyright & IP · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers
OpenAlex · 26 April 2023
Comparing ChatGPT and GPT-4 performance in USMLE soft skill assessments
OpenAlex · 1 October 2023
Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
OpenAlex · 10 January 2023
ChatGPT for healthcare services: An emerging stage for an innovative perspective
OpenAlex · 1 February 2023
Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
OpenAlex · 6 February 2023
Diagnostic Accuracy of Differential-Diagnosis Lists Generated by Generative Pretrained Transformer 3 Chatbot for Clinical Vignettes with Common Chief Complaints: A Pilot Study
OpenAlex · 15 February 2023
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 December 2022), “Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers,” evidence record 9113, https://ethics.ai/record/9113 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.