FAIR+S: A validation study of a framework for sustainable research data and software
The FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) have transformed research data management, but they do not address the environmental impact of creating and using research software and data, such as energy consumption, carbon emissions, and life-cycle impacts that become central to computer science and engineering-related domains. To bridge this gap FAIR+Sustainability or FAIR+S, an extension of the FAIR framework that embeds environmental accountability as a core element, was
Record details
Published: 17 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Towards Auditing AI Systems in the Wild
arXiv · 15 June 2026
SkillAudit: Ground-Truth-Free Skill Evolution via Paired Trajectory Auditing
arXiv · 12 June 2026
Extracting Semantics: LLM-Guided Automatic Population of Robot Ontology from URDF
arXiv · 10 June 2026
RAIL: Rethinking Auditory Intelligence in Large Audio-Language Models with a CHC-Grounded Benchmark
arXiv · 9 June 2026
Trustworthy Smart Fabs via Professional Proxies: Scaling Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) through Industrial Data Spaces
arXiv · 8 June 2026
Auditable Climate Risk Intelligence from Fragmented ESG Data: Deterministic Orchestration and Imbalance-Aware Learning for Scope 1-3 Validation
arXiv · 23 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (17 June 2026), “FAIR+S: A validation study of a framework for sustainable research data and software,” evidence record 846, https://ethics.ai/record/846 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.