RAIL: Rethinking Auditory Intelligence in Large Audio-Language Models with a CHC-Grounded Benchmark
Humans process rich auditory environments through tightly integrated cognitive capabilities such as audio perception, audio reasoning, and memory. Despite recent progress in large audio-language models (LALMs) across speech understanding and multimodal audio reasoning, current evaluation paradigms remain largely task- or modality-centric, focusing on end performance while overlooking underlying auditory cognitive behaviours. This reveals a fundamental gap between how auditory cognition is unders
Record details
Published: 9 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Transparency · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Trustworthy Smart Fabs via Professional Proxies: Scaling Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) through Industrial Data Spaces
arXiv · 8 June 2026
Extracting Semantics: LLM-Guided Automatic Population of Robot Ontology from URDF
arXiv · 10 June 2026
SkillAudit: Ground-Truth-Free Skill Evolution via Paired Trajectory Auditing
arXiv · 12 June 2026
Towards Auditing AI Systems in the Wild
arXiv · 15 June 2026
FAIR+S: A validation study of a framework for sustainable research data and software
arXiv · 17 June 2026
Auditable Climate Risk Intelligence from Fragmented ESG Data: Deterministic Orchestration and Imbalance-Aware Learning for Scope 1-3 Validation
arXiv · 23 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 June 2026), “RAIL: Rethinking Auditory Intelligence in Large Audio-Language Models with a CHC-Grounded Benchmark,” evidence record 1229, https://ethics.ai/record/1229 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.