Auditable Climate Risk Intelligence from Fragmented ESG Data: Deterministic Orchestration and Imbalance-Aware Learning for Scope 1-3 Validation
ESG and climate risk data remain fragmented across heterogeneous Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 reporting environments, while conventional validation pipelines lack provenance aware auditability, hidden drift detection, and reproducibility oriented governance. This paper proposes a deterministic climate risk intelligence framework integrating single source of truth orchestration, temporal anomaly detection, imbalance aware ensemble learning, and explainability oriented governance for auditable ES
Record details
Published: 23 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Transparency · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Trustworthy Smart Fabs via Professional Proxies: Scaling Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) through Industrial Data Spaces
arXiv · 8 June 2026
Counterfactual Shapley Credit Assignment
arXiv cs.LG · 18 July 2026
Enabling Multilingual Privacy Policy Audits: Large-Scale Analysis of Spanish Mobile Apps
arXiv cs.CY · 22 July 2026
Unfit for stranding assessment: a panel-scale multimodal-LLM audit of building-decarbonisation disclosure (BeDA)
arXiv cs.CY · 27 July 2026
AI Governance Control Stack for Operational Stability: Achieving Hardened Governance in AI Systems
arXiv · 12 March 2026
Short-term load forecasting under EU-AI Act Requirements in Safety-Critical Environments: Results from a 41-day live challenge on the aggregated German transmission-grid load
arXiv cs.AI · 5 August 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 May 2026), “Auditable Climate Risk Intelligence from Fragmented ESG Data: Deterministic Orchestration and Imbalance-Aware Learning for Scope 1-3 Validation,” evidence record 3819, https://ethics.ai/record/3819 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.