Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning
There has recently been a surge of work in explanatory artificial intelligence (XAI). This research area tackles the important problem that complex machines and algorithms often cannot provide insights into their behavior and thought processes. XAI allows users and parts of the internal system to be more transparent, providing explanations of their decisions in some level of detail. These explanations are important to ensure algorithmic fairness, identify potential bias/problems in the training
Record details
Published: 1 October 2018
Source: OpenAlex
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Prompt Programming for Cultural Bias and Alignment of Large Language Models
arXiv · 17 March 2026
Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Two Wrongs, No Right: Auditing Social-Desirability Bias in LLM Annotators for Computational Social Science
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Is Fairness Truly Fair? Towards Reliable Lipschitz Fairness in Multi-Task Learning via Fixed-\texorpdfstring{$δ$}{delta} Alignment
arXiv · 9 June 2026
X-FEMR: A Token-level Explainable Approach for Electronic Health Records Foundation Models using Transformer-based Models
arXiv · 7 July 2026
Trustworthy Machine Learning through the Lens of Combinatorial Optimization: Survey and Research Perspectives
arXiv fairness query · 8 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (1 October 2018), “Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning,” evidence record 8338, https://ethics.ai/record/8338 (originally published by OpenAlex).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.