Auditing Fairness-Privacy Trade-offs: Subpopulation-Level Effects of Fairness-Enhancing Algorithms
Machine learning (ML) models deployed in sensitive domains such as healthcare, law enforcement, and finance must satisfy not only utility requirements but also fairness and privacy guarantees. While prior work has largely examined how privacy-preserving techniques affect fairness, the inverse question-how fairness-enhancing algorithms influence privacy leakage-remains underexplored. We present the first comprehensive study of how fairness interventions affect membership inference privacy risks a
Record details
Published: 16 July 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Privacy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 18 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
A Computational Ethical Framework for Financial Digital Phenotyping for Mental Health
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Ethical Fairness in Ubiquitous Health Sensing without Known Attributes
arXiv · 10 March 2026
Governing Healthcare AI in the Real World: How Fairness, Transparency, and Human Oversight Can Coexist: A Narrative Review
OpenAlex · 6 February 2026
Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI
OpenAlex · 27 February 2025
AI Ethics: Integrating Transparency, Fairness, and Privacy in AI Development
OpenAlex · 7 February 2025
Trustworthy Privacy-Preserving Multimodal Federated Learning for Personalised Breast Cancer Prediction
arXiv · 21 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 July 2026), “Auditing Fairness-Privacy Trade-offs: Subpopulation-Level Effects of Fairness-Enhancing Algorithms,” evidence record 11360, https://ethics.ai/record/11360 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.