Can Persona-Prompted LLMs Emulate Subgroup Values? An Empirical Analysis of Generalisability and Fairness in Cultural Alignment
Despite their global prevalence, many Large Language Models (LLMs) are aligned to a monolithic, often Western-centric set of values. This paper investigates the more challenging task of fine-grained value alignment: examining whether LLMs can emulate the distinct cultural values of demographic subgroups. Using Singapore as a case study and the World Values Survey (WVS), we examine the value landscape and show that even state-of-the-art models like GPT-4.1 achieve only 57.4% accuracy in predictin
Record details
Published: 14 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Working Memory Constraints Scaffold Learning in Transformers under Data Scarcity
arXiv · 22 April 2026
Subtitle-Aligned Fine-Tuning of Whisper for Swiss German ASR: Benchmark Contamination, Convention Mismatch, and an Honest Baseline at 25.6% WER (13.8% cWER)
arXiv · 29 May 2026
Identifying Implicit Bias in LLM-based Chat AI Toward People with Intellectual Disabilities
arXiv cs.CY · 30 July 2026
Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models
OpenAlex · 1 September 2024
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
OpenAlex · 17 March 2023
Amazon completes $50bn investment in OpenAI
Financial Times Technology (headlines) · 31 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 April 2026), “Can Persona-Prompted LLMs Emulate Subgroup Values? An Empirical Analysis of Generalisability and Fairness in Cultural Alignment,” evidence record 5866, https://ethics.ai/record/5866 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.