The Landscape of Generative AI in Information Systems: A Synthesis of Secondary Reviews and Research Agendas
As organizations grapple with the rapid adoption of Generative AI (GenAI), this study synthesizes the state of knowledge through a systematic literature review of secondary studies and research agendas. Analyzing 28 papers published since 2023, we find that while GenAI offers transformative potential for productivity and innovation, its adoption is constrained by multiple interrelated challenges, including technical unreliability (hallucinations, performance drift), societal-ethical risks (bias,
Record details
Published: 12 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Gender Bias in Generative AI-assisted Recruitment Processes
arXiv · 12 March 2026
Anterior's Approach to Fairness Evaluation of Automated Prior Authorization System
arXiv · 15 March 2026
Is Your LLM-as-a-Recommender Agent Trustable? LLMs' Recommendation is Easily Hacked by Biases (Preferences)
arXiv · 18 March 2026
Small Changes, Big Impact: Demographic Bias in LLM-Based Hiring Through Subtle Sociocultural Markers in Anonymised Resumes
arXiv · 5 March 2026
Cognitive Agency Surrender: Defending Epistemic Sovereignty via Scaffolded AI Friction
arXiv · 23 March 2026
Bias in the Tails: How Name-conditioned Evaluative Framing in Resume Summaries Destabilizes LLM-based Hiring
arXiv · 21 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (12 March 2026), “The Landscape of Generative AI in Information Systems: A Synthesis of Secondary Reviews and Research Agendas,” evidence record 7335, https://ethics.ai/record/7335 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.