Cognitive Agency Surrender: Defending Epistemic Sovereignty via Scaffolded AI Friction
The proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence has transformed benign cognitive offloading into a systemic risk of cognitive agency surrender. Driven by the commercial dogma of "zero-friction" design, highly fluent AI interfaces actively exploit human cognitive miserliness, prematurely satisfying the need for cognitive closure and inducing severe automation bias. To empirically quantify this epistemic erosion, we deployed a zero-shot semantic classification pipeline ($τ=0.7$) on 1,223 h
Record details
Published: 23 March 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Jobs & economy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Is Your LLM-as-a-Recommender Agent Trustable? LLMs' Recommendation is Easily Hacked by Biases (Preferences)
arXiv · 18 March 2026
Anterior's Approach to Fairness Evaluation of Automated Prior Authorization System
arXiv · 15 March 2026
The Landscape of Generative AI in Information Systems: A Synthesis of Secondary Reviews and Research Agendas
arXiv · 12 March 2026
Gender Bias in Generative AI-assisted Recruitment Processes
arXiv · 12 March 2026
Small Changes, Big Impact: Demographic Bias in LLM-Based Hiring Through Subtle Sociocultural Markers in Anonymised Resumes
arXiv · 5 March 2026
Bias in the Tails: How Name-conditioned Evaluative Framing in Resume Summaries Destabilizes LLM-based Hiring
arXiv · 21 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 March 2026), “Cognitive Agency Surrender: Defending Epistemic Sovereignty via Scaffolded AI Friction,” evidence record 6861, https://ethics.ai/record/6861 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.