Coupled Control, Structured Memory, and Verifiable Action in Agentic AI (SCRAT -- Stochastic Control with Retrieval and Auditable Trajectories): A Comparative Perspective from Squirrel Locomotion and Scatter-Hoarding
Agentic AI is increasingly judged not by fluent output alone but by whether it can act, remember, and verify under partial observability, delay, and strategic observation. Existing research often studies these demands separately: robotics emphasizes control, retrieval systems emphasize memory, and alignment or assurance work emphasizes checking and oversight. This article argues that squirrel ecology offers a sharp comparative case because arboreal locomotion, scatter-hoarding, and audience-sens
Record details
Published: 3 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Cognitive Comparability and the Limits of Governance: Evaluating Authority Under Radical Capability Asymmetry
arXiv · 3 April 2026
DIRECT: Video Mashup Creation via Hierarchical Multi-Agent Planning and Intent-Guided Editing
arXiv · 6 April 2026
From Helpful to Trustworthy: LLM Agents for Pair Programming
arXiv · 11 April 2026
A Framework for Longitudinal Health AI Agents
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment
arXiv · 21 April 2026
COMPASS: The explainable agentic framework for Sovereignty, Sustainability, Compliance, and Ethics
arXiv · 11 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (3 April 2026), “Coupled Control, Structured Memory, and Verifiable Action in Agentic AI (SCRAT -- Stochastic Control with Retrieval and Auditable Trajectories): A Comparative Perspective from Squirrel Locomotion and Scatter-Hoarding,” evidence record 6382, https://ethics.ai/record/6382 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.