GCT-MARL: Graph-Based Contrastive Transfer for Sample-Efficient Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), from a deployment perspective, it is challenging and expensive to train agents from scratch for each new environment or task. In this work, we propose GCT-MARL, a transfer learning framework that builds on the multi-view graph contrastive backbone of MAIL and augments it with a per-view, adaptively weighted alignment loss and a two-phase training protocol specifically designed for transfer across populations of varying sizes and compositi
Record details
Published: 23 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
IDEA: Insensitive to Dynamics Mismatch via Effect Alignment for Sim-to-Real Transfer in Multi-Agent Control
arXiv · 25 June 2026
LLawCo: Learning Laws of Cooperation for Modeling Embodied Multi-Agent Behavior
arXiv · 26 June 2026
Risk-Aware LLM Agents for Geospatial Data Retrieval: Design and Preliminary Adversarial Evaluation
arXiv · 13 June 2026
STAR: Skeletal Token Alignment and Rearrangement for Interaction Recognition
arXiv · 19 July 2026
AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security
arXiv · 28 May 2026
How Coding Agents Fail Their Users: A Large-Scale Analysis of Developer-Agent Misalignment in 20,574 Real-World Sessions
arXiv · 28 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (23 June 2026), “GCT-MARL: Graph-Based Contrastive Transfer for Sample-Efficient Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning,” evidence record 635, https://ethics.ai/record/635 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.