IDEA: Insensitive to Dynamics Mismatch via Effect Alignment for Sim-to-Real Transfer in Multi-Agent Control
Complex multi-agent control tasks remain challenging for traditional rule-based and model-based approaches, motivating the adoption of learning-based methods. However, learning-based methods often struggle with sim-to-real transfer because they rely on accurate dynamics modeling or system identification and learn policies in low-level control spaces that are highly sensitive to dynamics mismatch, making them costly and fragile in complex environments. To address this issue, we propose a sim-to-r
Record details
Published: 25 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
GCT-MARL: Graph-Based Contrastive Transfer for Sample-Efficient Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · 23 June 2026
LLawCo: Learning Laws of Cooperation for Modeling Embodied Multi-Agent Behavior
arXiv · 26 June 2026
Risk-Aware LLM Agents for Geospatial Data Retrieval: Design and Preliminary Adversarial Evaluation
arXiv · 13 June 2026
STAR: Skeletal Token Alignment and Rearrangement for Interaction Recognition
arXiv · 19 July 2026
AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security
arXiv · 28 May 2026
How Coding Agents Fail Their Users: A Large-Scale Analysis of Developer-Agent Misalignment in 20,574 Real-World Sessions
arXiv · 28 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (25 June 2026), “IDEA: Insensitive to Dynamics Mismatch via Effect Alignment for Sim-to-Real Transfer in Multi-Agent Control,” evidence record 585, https://ethics.ai/record/585 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.