AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security
Modern open-world agents such as OpenClaw exhibit powerful cross-environment execution capabilities yet introduce broad new safety risk sources. Meanwhile, advanced frontier AI models drastically lower attack barriers, rendering current agent alignment frameworks inadequate for real-world deployment. To tackle these emerging threats, we propose a lightweight and scalable agent safety alignment framework. Specifically, we update the agent safety taxonomy to accommodate emergent risks from Codex a
Record details
Published: 28 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
How Coding Agents Fail Their Users: A Large-Scale Analysis of Developer-Agent Misalignment in 20,574 Real-World Sessions
arXiv · 28 May 2026
Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Position: AI Safety Requires Effective Controllability
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Infra-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Agents Outperform Classical RL For Worst-Case Robustness
arXiv · 22 May 2026
How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models
arXiv · 20 May 2026
Brain alignment of reasoning and action representations from vision-language and action models during naturalistic gameplay
arXiv · 19 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (28 May 2026), “AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security,” evidence record 3513, https://ethics.ai/record/3513 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.