Evidence record 5817 · automatically gathered

From Disclosure to Self-Referential Opacity: Six Dimensions of Strain in Current AI Governance

Governance opacity over AI systems shifts in kind as capability asymmetry grows, and the strongest forms defeat the disclosure-based remedies governance ordinarily relies on. This paper applies a six-dimension framework from political theory (legitimacy, accountability, corrigibility, non-domination, subsidiarity, institutional resilience) to six AI governance arrangements already in operation, ordered by increasing capability asymmetry between system and overseer. Proprietary secrecy yields to

Record details

Published: 15 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026

source-onlyevidence status

These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.

How to cite this record

ethics.ai (15 April 2026), “From Disclosure to Self-Referential Opacity: Six Dimensions of Strain in Current AI Governance,” evidence record 5817, https://ethics.ai/record/5817 (originally published by arXiv).

JSON

Use and limitations

This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.