From Consumption to Reflection: Designing Human-AI Relations for Stable Reasoning
Large language models (LLMs) have transformed how humans access information, but not how we reason with it. Their fluency accelerates consumption while bypassing the slow, reflective processes that underpin sound judgment. This paper introduces Relational Reflective Intelligence (RRI), an inference-time governance layer that operationalizes reflection through auditable reasoning loops. RRI operates not inside the model but around it, providing a practical structure for stable, auditable reasonin
Record details
Published: 17 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Missing Knowledge Layer in AI: A Framework for Stable Human-AI Reasoning
arXiv · 16 April 2026
Governance by Design: Architecting Agentic AI for Organizational Learning and Scalable Autonomy
arXiv · 17 April 2026
"Taking Stock at FAccT": Using Participatory Design to Co-Create a Vision for the Fairness, Accountability and Transparency Community
arXiv · 17 April 2026
Decentralized autonomous organization and blockchain-based incentivization framework for community-based facilities management
arXiv · 16 April 2026
Agentic Explainability at Scale: Between Corporate Fears and XAI Needs
arXiv · 16 April 2026
From Parliamentary Rhetoric to Enacted Law: An NLP Pipeline for Semantic Auditing of the Greek Legislative Process
arXiv · 16 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (17 April 2026), “From Consumption to Reflection: Designing Human-AI Relations for Stable Reasoning,” evidence record 5737, https://ethics.ai/record/5737 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.