Agentic Explainability at Scale: Between Corporate Fears and XAI Needs
As companies enter the race for agentic AI adoption, fears surface around agentic autonomy and its subsequent risks. These fears compound as companies scale their agentic AI adoption with low-code applications, without a comparable scaling in their governance processes and expertise resulting in a phenomenon known as "Agent Sprawl". While shadow AI tools can help with agentic discovery and identification, few observability tools offer insights into the agents' configuration and settings or the d
Record details
Published: 16 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Governance by Design: Architecting Agentic AI for Organizational Learning and Scalable Autonomy
arXiv · 17 April 2026
EmbodiedGovBench: A Benchmark for Governance, Recovery, and Upgrade Safety in Embodied Agent Systems
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Governed Reasoning for Institutional AI
arXiv · 12 April 2026
Governed Auditable Decisioning Under Uncertainty: Synthesis and Agentic Extension
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Stateless Decision Memory for Enterprise AI Agents
arXiv · 22 April 2026
The Accountability Horizon: An Impossibility Theorem for Governing Human-Agent Collectives
arXiv · 9 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 April 2026), “Agentic Explainability at Scale: Between Corporate Fears and XAI Needs,” evidence record 5775, https://ethics.ai/record/5775 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.