AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment
Artificial Intelligence is increasingly introduced into systems engineering activities, particularly within requirements engineering, where quality assessment and validation remain heavily dependent on expert judgment. While recent AI tools demonstrate promising capabilities in analyzing and generating requirements, their role within formal systems engineering processes-and their alignment with established INCOSE criteria-remains insufficiently understood. This paper investigates the extent to w
Record details
Published: 16 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Safety & alignment · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Gaslight, Gatekeep, V1-V3: Early Visual Cortex Alignment Shields Vision-Language Models from Sycophantic Manipulation
arXiv · 15 April 2026
CLIP Architecture for Abdominal CT Image-Text Alignment and Zero-Shot Learning: Investigating Batch Composition and Data Scaling
arXiv · 15 April 2026
Can Persona-Prompted LLMs Emulate Subgroup Values? An Empirical Analysis of Generalisability and Fairness in Cultural Alignment
arXiv · 14 April 2026
Identifying and Mitigating Gender Cues in Academic Recommendation Letters: An Interpretability Case Study
arXiv · 14 April 2026
Putting HUMANS first: Efficient LAM Evaluation with Human Preference Alignment
arXiv · 20 April 2026
A Layer-wise Analysis of Supervised Fine-Tuning
arXiv · 12 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 April 2026), “AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment,” evidence record 5766, https://ethics.ai/record/5766 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.