The Missing Knowledge Layer in AI: A Framework for Stable Human-AI Reasoning
Large language models are increasingly integrated into decision-making in areas such as healthcare, law, finance, engineering, and government. Yet they share a critical limitation: they produce fluent outputs even when their internal reasoning has drifted. A confident answer can conceal uncertainty, speculation, or inconsistency, and small changes in phrasing can lead to different conclusions. This makes LLMs useful assistants but unreliable partners in high-stakes contexts. Humans exhibit a sim
Record details
Published: 16 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
From Consumption to Reflection: Designing Human-AI Relations for Stable Reasoning
arXiv · 17 April 2026
Governing Reflective Human-AI Collaboration: A Framework for Epistemic Scaffolding and Traceable Reasoning
arXiv · 16 April 2026
Meituan Merchant Business Diagnosis via Policy-Guided Dual-Process User Simulation
arXiv · 16 April 2026
Towards Reliable Testing of Machine Unlearning
arXiv · 16 April 2026
EuropeMedQA Study Protocol: A Multilingual, Multimodal Medical Examination Dataset for Language Model Evaluation
arXiv · 15 April 2026
Evidence Sufficiency Under Delayed Ground Truth: Proxy Monitoring for Risk Decision Systems
arXiv · 17 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (16 April 2026), “The Missing Knowledge Layer in AI: A Framework for Stable Human-AI Reasoning,” evidence record 5785, https://ethics.ai/record/5785 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.