Value-Conflict Diagnostics Reveal Widespread Alignment Faking in Language Models
Alignment faking, where a model behaves aligned with developer policy when monitored but reverts to its own preferences when unobserved, is a concerning yet poorly understood phenomenon, in part because current diagnostic tools remain limited. Prior diagnostics rely on highly toxic and clearly harmful scenarios, causing most models to refuse immediately. As a result, models never deliberate over developer policy, monitoring conditions, or the consequences of non-compliance, making these diagnost
Record details
Published: 22 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Four-Axis Decision Alignment for Long-Horizon Enterprise AI Agents
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Think Before You Act -- A Neurocognitive Governance Model for Autonomous AI Agents
arXiv · 28 April 2026
A Proposed Biomedical Data Policy Framework to Reduce Fragmentation, Improve Quality, and Incentivize Sharing in Indian Healthcare in the era of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health
arXiv · 13 April 2026
AI Integrity: A New Paradigm for Verifiable AI Governance
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Physiological and Semantic Patterns in Medical Teams Using an Intelligent Tutoring System
arXiv · 31 March 2026
Behavioural feasible set: Value alignment constraints on AI decision support
arXiv · 22 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 April 2026), “Value-Conflict Diagnostics Reveal Widespread Alignment Faking in Language Models,” evidence record 5485, https://ethics.ai/record/5485 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.