AI Integrity: A New Paradigm for Verifiable AI Governance
AI systems increasingly shape high-stakes decisions in healthcare, law, defense, and education, yet existing governance paradigms -- AI Ethics, AI Safety, and AI Alignment -- share a common limitation: they evaluate outcomes rather than verifying the reasoning process itself. This paper introduces AI Integrity, a concept defined as a state in which the Authority Stack of an AI system -- its layered hierarchy of values, epistemological standards, source preferences, and data selection criteria --
Record details
Published: 13 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Safety & alignment · Healthcare · Military & security
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
PRISM Risk Signal Framework: Hierarchy-Based Red Lines for AI Behavioral Risk
arXiv · 13 April 2026
A Proposed Biomedical Data Policy Framework to Reduce Fragmentation, Improve Quality, and Incentivize Sharing in Indian Healthcare in the era of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Artificial Pancreas Implantables -- How Healthcare Professionals May Deal With DIY Bio Cases
arXiv · 11 April 2026
enclawed: A Configurable, Sector-Neutral Hardening Framework for Single-User AI Assistant Gateways
arXiv · 18 April 2026
Four-Axis Decision Alignment for Long-Horizon Enterprise AI Agents
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Value-Conflict Diagnostics Reveal Widespread Alignment Faking in Language Models
arXiv · 22 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (13 April 2026), “AI Integrity: A New Paradigm for Verifiable AI Governance,” evidence record 5962, https://ethics.ai/record/5962 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.