Strat-LLM: Stratified Strategy Alignment for LLM-based Stock Trading with Real-time Multi-Source Signals
Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving into autonomous trading agents, yet existing benchmarks often overlook the interplay between architectural reasoning and strategy consistency. We propose Strat-LLM, a framework grounded in Stratified Strategy Alignment. Operating in a live-forward setting throughout 2025, it integrates heterogeneous data including sequential prices, real-time news, and annual reports to eliminate look-ahead bias. Extensive stress tests on A-share and U.S. markets reveal:
Record details
Published: 7 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Position: Safety and Fairness in Agentic AI Depend on Interaction Topology, Not on Model Scale or Alignment
arXiv · 1 May 2026
FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality Estimation
arXiv · 23 April 2026
Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment
arXiv · 21 April 2026
Frequency-Enhanced Diffusion Models: Curriculum-Guided Semantic Alignment for Zero-Shot Skeleton Action Recognition
arXiv · 10 April 2026
BeliefShift: Benchmarking Temporal Belief Consistency and Opinion Drift in LLM Agents
arXiv · 25 March 2026
LLM Constitutional Multi-Agent Governance
arXiv · 13 March 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (7 May 2026), “Strat-LLM: Stratified Strategy Alignment for LLM-based Stock Trading with Real-time Multi-Source Signals,” evidence record 4844, https://ethics.ai/record/4844 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.