Context-Aware Hospitalization Forecasting Evaluations for Decision Support using LLMs
Medical and public health experts must make real-time resource decisions, such as expanding hospital bed capacity, based on projected hospitalization trends during large-scale healthcare disruptions (e.g., operational failures or pandemics). Forecasting models can assist in this task by analyzing large volumes of resource-related data at the facility level, but they must be reliable for decision-making under real-world data conditions. Recent work shows that large language models (LLMs) can inco
Record details
Published: 27 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
An empirical evaluation of the risks of AI model updates using clinical data: stability, arbitrariness, and fairness
arXiv · 27 April 2026
The Ethical Knowledge Gap: Dispersed Knowledge, Sensemaking Failures, and Epistemic Dependence
arXiv · 27 April 2026
MultiDx: A Multi-Source Knowledge Integration Framework towards Diagnostic Reasoning
arXiv · 27 April 2026
FAIR_XAI: Improving Multimodal Foundation Model Fairness via Explainability for Wellbeing Assessment
arXiv · 26 April 2026
FastOMOP: A Foundational Architecture for Reliable Agentic Real-World Evidence Generation on OMOP CDM data
arXiv · 27 April 2026
Quantum Kernel Advantage over Classical Collapse in Medical Foundation Model Embeddings
arXiv · 27 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 April 2026), “Context-Aware Hospitalization Forecasting Evaluations for Decision Support using LLMs,” evidence record 5334, https://ethics.ai/record/5334 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.