MultiDx: A Multi-Source Knowledge Integration Framework towards Diagnostic Reasoning
Diagnostic prediction and clinical reasoning are critical tasks in healthcare applications. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in commonsense reasoning, they still struggle with diagnostic reasoning due to limited domain knowledge. Existing approaches often rely on internal model knowledge or static knowledge bases, resulting in knowledge insufficiency and limited adaptability, which hinder their capacity to perform diagnostic reasoning. Moreover, these methods foc
Record details
Published: 27 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
The Ethical Knowledge Gap: Dispersed Knowledge, Sensemaking Failures, and Epistemic Dependence
arXiv · 27 April 2026
FastOMOP: A Foundational Architecture for Reliable Agentic Real-World Evidence Generation on OMOP CDM data
arXiv · 27 April 2026
Quantum Kernel Advantage over Classical Collapse in Medical Foundation Model Embeddings
arXiv · 27 April 2026
An empirical evaluation of the risks of AI model updates using clinical data: stability, arbitrariness, and fairness
arXiv · 27 April 2026
Context-Aware Hospitalization Forecasting Evaluations for Decision Support using LLMs
arXiv · 27 April 2026
Safety Drift After Fine-Tuning: Evidence from High-Stakes Domains
arXiv · 27 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 April 2026), “MultiDx: A Multi-Source Knowledge Integration Framework towards Diagnostic Reasoning,” evidence record 5319, https://ethics.ai/record/5319 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.