An empirical evaluation of the risks of AI model updates using clinical data: stability, arbitrariness, and fairness
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML) models used in clinical settings are increasingly deployed to support clinical decision-making. However, when training data become stale due to changes in demographics, environment, or patient behaviors, model performance can degrade substantially. While updating models with new training data is necessary, such updates may also introduce new risks. We evaluated the proposed monitoring framework on four publicly available U.S.-based Type 1 Diab
Record details
Published: 27 April 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Adaptive Filtering of the KV Cache: Diagnosing and Correcting Structural-Role Bias in LLM Inference
arXiv · 14 July 2026
Multi-omics approaches for understanding gene-environment interactions in noncommunicable diseases: techniques, translation, and equity issues
OpenAlex · 31 January 2025
FAIR_XAI: Improving Multimodal Foundation Model Fairness via Explainability for Wellbeing Assessment
arXiv · 26 April 2026
UVTran: Accurate Hole-Filling Parameterization with Transformers
arXiv · 27 April 2026
Applications of the Transformer Architecture in AI-Assisted English Reading Comprehension
arXiv · 26 April 2026
Below-Chance Blindness: Prompted Underperformance in Small LLMs Produces Positional Bias Rather than Answer Avoidance
arXiv · 28 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (27 April 2026), “An empirical evaluation of the risks of AI model updates using clinical data: stability, arbitrariness, and fairness,” evidence record 5333, https://ethics.ai/record/5333 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.