Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution
As artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) models and foundation models (FMs), are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, ensuring their trustworthiness has become a central challenge. However, the core trustworthy AI objectives, such as fairness, robustness, privacy, and explainability, are hard to achieve simultaneously, especially while preserving utility. This position paper argues that causality is necessary to understand and balance trade-offs in performance an
Record details
Published: 4 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Privacy · Transparency
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
FairHealth: An Open-Source Python Library for Trustworthy Healthcare AI in Low-Resource Settings
arXiv · 5 May 2026
TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1
arXiv · 29 April 2026
TIER: Trajectory-Invariant Explanation Regularization for Membership Privacy
arXiv · 3 July 2026
Trustworthy Machine Learning through the Lens of Combinatorial Optimization: Survey and Research Perspectives
arXiv fairness query · 8 July 2026
Trustworthy Privacy-Preserving Multimodal Federated Learning for Personalised Breast Cancer Prediction
arXiv · 21 July 2026
Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 23 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 May 2026), “Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution,” evidence record 5018, https://ethics.ai/record/5018 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.