MenuNet: A Strategy-Proof Mechanism for Matching Markets
Strategy-proofness is a fundamental desideratum in mechanism design, ensuring truthful reporting and robust participation. Stability is another central requirement in matching markets, widely adopted in applications such as school choice and labor market clearing. In practice, however, these markets are invariably governed by complex distributional constraints, ranging from diversity quotas and regional balance to global capacity slacks, under which stable matchings often fail to exist. This rai
Record details
Published: 4 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Jobs & economy · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
KG-First, LLM-Fallback: A Hybrid Microservice for Grounded Skill Search and Explanation
arXiv · 2 May 2026
Towards an Ethical AI Curriculum: A Pan-African, Culturally Contextualized Framework for Primary and Secondary Education
arXiv · 30 April 2026
Cost-of-Ethics Crisis: Beliefs, Decisions, and Justifications in the Job Searches of Computer Science Students in Canada and the United States
arXiv · 10 May 2026
AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Auditing Engagement Incentives in the Kidfluencer Ecosystem: A Multimodal Weak Supervision Approach
arXiv · 2 June 2026
TurtleAI: Benchmarking Multimodal Models for Visual Programming in Turtle Graphics
arXiv · 2 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (4 May 2026), “MenuNet: A Strategy-Proof Mechanism for Matching Markets,” evidence record 4994, https://ethics.ai/record/4994 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.