The Challenges of Balancing AI Compliance and Technological Innovations in Critical Sectors: A Systematic Literature Review
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into critical infrastructure including healthcare, finance, energy, and defense, offers transformative benefits but also conflicts with evolving regulatory and governance frameworks. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) to examine the challenges of balancing AI compliance and technological innovation across critical infrastructure sectors. The review follows established SLR guidelines to extract and synthesize insights fro
Record details
Published: 9 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Healthcare · Military & security · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Regulatory Relief for Certain Stationary Sources to Promote American Chemical Manufacturing Security
White House · 13 July 2026
Toward Zero-Egress Psychiatric AI: On-Device LLM Deployment for Privacy-Preserving Mental Health Decision Support
arXiv · 20 April 2026
enclawed: A Configurable, Sector-Neutral Hardening Framework for Single-User AI Assistant Gateways
arXiv · 18 April 2026
AI Integrity: A New Paradigm for Verifiable AI Governance
arXiv · 13 April 2026
Explainable AI-Driven Cyber Risk Analytics and Model Reliability Assessment for Intelligent Governance of U.S. Critical Infrastructure: An XGBoost and SHAP-Based Intrusion Detection Framework
arXiv · 4 June 2026
Artificial Pancreas Implantables -- How Healthcare Professionals May Deal With DIY Bio Cases
arXiv · 11 April 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (9 May 2026), “The Challenges of Balancing AI Compliance and Technological Innovations in Critical Sectors: A Systematic Literature Review,” evidence record 4689, https://ethics.ai/record/4689 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.