Accelerometry-Derived Digital Biomarkers for Cardiometabolic Risk: A Population-Representative Tabular Benchmark with Uncertainty Quantification
Structured tabular data dominates clinical medicine, yet existing benchmarks fail to reflect real-world properties like complex survey sampling, demographic oversampling, and subgroup fairness. We introduce the NHANES Accelerometry Cardiometabolic Benchmark, derived from NHANES 2003-2006, comprising 1,381 adults with hip-worn accelerometry, fasting laboratory biomarkers, dietary intake, and anthropometrics. We evaluate three tabular learning methods -- ridge regression, XGBoost, and the foundati
Record details
Published: 29 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Moral Safety in LLMs: Exposing Performative Compliance with Puzzled Cues
arXiv · 30 June 2026
Who Gets Missed in the Tail? Thresholded Subgroup Underdiagnosis in Long-Tailed Chest X-ray Classification
arXiv fairness query · 4 July 2026
Fairness in federated medical imaging: a systematic review through the dual fairness lens
Artificial Intelligence Review · 5 July 2026
MMed-Bench-IR: A Heterogeneous Benchmark for Multilingual Medical Information Retrieval
arXiv · 23 June 2026
Constance Viehbeck
LSE Data Science Institute · 6 July 2026
Whose fairness? Structural concentration in AI bias research
arXiv · 6 July 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (29 June 2026), “Accelerometry-Derived Digital Biomarkers for Cardiometabolic Risk: A Population-Representative Tabular Benchmark with Uncertainty Quantification,” evidence record 447, https://ethics.ai/record/447 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.