Fairness in federated medical imaging: a systematic review through the dual fairness lens
Federated learning (FL) enables multi-institutional collaboration in medical imaging while preserving patient privacy, yet its fairness landscape remains fragmented: existing methods predominantly address either collaboration fairness (equitable performance across institutions) or group fairness (equitable outcomes across demographic subgroups), but rarely both. In this systematic review, we adopt dual fairness —the joint satisfaction of both dimensions—as the analytical lens for organizing and
Record details
Published: 5 July 2026
Source: Artificial Intelligence Review
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Privacy · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Auditing Fairness-Privacy Trade-offs: Subpopulation-Level Effects of Fairness-Enhancing Algorithms
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Trustworthy Privacy-Preserving Multimodal Federated Learning for Personalised Breast Cancer Prediction
arXiv · 21 July 2026
Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification
arXiv cs.CR (AI security) · 23 July 2026
A Computational Ethical Framework for Financial Digital Phenotyping for Mental Health
arXiv cs.CY · 28 July 2026
Trustworthy AI in Digital Health: A Comprehensive Review of Robustness and Explainability
arXiv · 3 August 2026
FairHealth: An Open-Source Python Library for Trustworthy Healthcare AI in Low-Resource Settings
arXiv · 5 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (5 July 2026), “Fairness in federated medical imaging: a systematic review through the dual fairness lens,” evidence record 1985, https://ethics.ai/record/1985 (originally published by Artificial Intelligence Review).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.