Moral Safety in LLMs: Exposing Performative Compliance with Puzzled Cues
As large language models take on morally consequential roles in healthcare, legal, and hiring contexts, we need to examine whether their ethical behaviors are genuine or superficial. We show that current fairness evaluations substantially overestimate moral safety. Models appear fair when demographic identity is stated as an explicit label, yet become measurably less fair when the same identity must be inferred. We term this failure performative compliance, where a model is fair when the present
Record details
Published: 30 June 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Regulation · Healthcare
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Constance Viehbeck
LSE Data Science Institute · 6 July 2026
Whose fairness? Structural concentration in AI bias research
arXiv · 6 July 2026
AgentFairBench: Do LLM Agents Discriminate When They Act?
arXiv · 15 June 2026
Auditing Fairness-Privacy Trade-offs: Subpopulation-Level Effects of Fairness-Enhancing Algorithms
arXiv · 16 July 2026
Bridging Geographic Bias in Urban Streetscape Inference via Lifelong Learning with Visual-Semantic Pivoting
arXiv · 13 June 2026
Beyond the Algorithm: Professional Experiences and Perceptions of AI Bias
arXiv · 13 June 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (30 June 2026), “Moral Safety in LLMs: Exposing Performative Compliance with Puzzled Cues,” evidence record 394, https://ethics.ai/record/394 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.