Learning with Conflicts of Interest
Financial, social, and political factors often prevent the interests of the owners of ML systems and services and their users from being perfectly aligned. ML systems often produce biased information that can influence users to make decisions that are not in their best interest. Current solution approaches require ML systems to implement protocols to mitigate their biases. However, ML system owners usually do not have any incentive to implement these protocols and often argue that it limits thei
Record details
Published: 15 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Avoiding Structural Failure Modes in Tabular Fair SSL: Online Primal-Dual Allocation under Confidence Gating
arXiv · 15 May 2026
TopoEvo: A Topology-Aware Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Framework for Root Cause Analysis in Microservices
arXiv · 15 May 2026
Beyond Performance Disparities: A Three-Level Audit of Representational Harm in CelebA
arXiv · 14 May 2026
GESD: Beyond Outcome-Oriented Fairness
arXiv · 14 May 2026
Tradeoffs are Domain Dependent: Improving Accuracy and Fairness in Property Tax Assessments
arXiv · 14 May 2026
Static and Dynamic Strategies for Influencing Opinions in Social Networks
arXiv · 14 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (15 May 2026), “Learning with Conflicts of Interest,” evidence record 4292, https://ethics.ai/record/4292 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.