GESD: Beyond Outcome-Oriented Fairness
Machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly deployed in high-stakes decision-making domains such as loan approvals, hiring, and recidivism predictions. While existing fairness metrics (e.g., statistical parity, equal opportunity) effectively quantify outcome-oriented disparities, they offer limited insight into the procedure or explanation behind biased decisions. To address this gap, we propose Group-level Explanation Stability Disparity (GESD), a \textit{procedural-oriented} fairness met
Record details
Published: 14 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Do Fair Models Reason Fairly? Counterfactual Explanation Consistency for Procedural Fairness in Credit Decisions
arXiv · 12 May 2026
Fairness of Explanations in Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Unifying Framework, Axioms, and Future Direction toward Responsible AI
arXiv · 11 May 2026
MESD: A Risk-Sensitive Metric for Explanation Fairness Across Intersectional Subgroups
arXiv · 13 March 2026
Procedural Fairness via Group Counterfactual Explanation
arXiv · 11 March 2026
Beyond Performance Disparities: A Three-Level Audit of Representational Harm in CelebA
arXiv · 14 May 2026
Tradeoffs are Domain Dependent: Improving Accuracy and Fairness in Property Tax Assessments
arXiv · 14 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 May 2026), “GESD: Beyond Outcome-Oriented Fairness,” evidence record 4308, https://ethics.ai/record/4308 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.