Static and Dynamic Strategies for Influencing Opinions in Social Networks
The ability of a small set of coordinated actors to manipulate opinions in online social networks poses a serious challenge to the fairness and integrity of public debate. We investigate this problem by studying how targeted stubborn agents can shift the average opinion of a network governed by the Hegselmann-Krause bounded-confidence dynamics. Experiments are conducted on weighted LFR benchmark networks with community structure, using multiple node-selection strategies based on degree, strength
Record details
Published: 14 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Agents & autonomy · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Beyond Independent Manipulation: Individual Fairness-aware Strategic Classification with Peer Imitation
arXiv · 30 May 2026
Aligned Agents, Biased Swarm: Measuring Bias Amplification in Multi-Agent Systems
arXiv · 10 April 2026
QoS-Aware Token Scheduling and Private Data Valuation for Multi-Modal Agentic Networks
arXiv · 2 April 2026
Analysis Of Linguistic Stereotypes in Single and Multi-Agent Generative AI Architectures
arXiv · 19 March 2026
Can Induced Emotion Bias LLM Behaviors in Sequential Decision Making?
arXiv cs.AI · 14 July 2026
Artificial intelligence and augmented intelligence collaboration: regaining trust and confidence in the financial sector
OpenAlex · 25 June 2018
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (14 May 2026), “Static and Dynamic Strategies for Influencing Opinions in Social Networks,” evidence record 4318, https://ethics.ai/record/4318 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.