HAAS Studio: A Tool for Simulating, Benchmarking, and Governing Human-AI Work Allocation
We present HAAS Studio, a simulation and decision-support tool for policy-aware adaptive task allocation between humans and AI systems. HAAS Studio turns the HAAS framework into an interactive environment for asking a practical deployment question: before introducing AI into a workflow, how can a team compare allocation strategies, inspect governance tradeoffs, and derive a defensible task-level operating model? The tool combines a five-dimensional cognitive representation of subtasks, a five-mo
Record details
Published: 18 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
SkillsVote: Lifecycle Governance of Agent Skills from Collection, Recommendation to Evolution
arXiv · 18 May 2026
Jurisdiction over Ubiquitous Copyright Infringements: Should Right-Holders Be Allowed to Sue at Home?
arXiv · 17 May 2026
CR4T: Rewrite-Based Guardrails for Adolescent LLM Safety
arXiv · 20 May 2026
Infra-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Agents Outperform Classical RL For Worst-Case Robustness
arXiv · 22 May 2026
From Frontier to Shadow AI: A Simmering Threat to Assurance and Security in Critical Infrastructure
arXiv · 23 May 2026
ROAD: Adaptive Data Mixing for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning via Bi-Level Optimization
arXiv · 14 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (18 May 2026), “HAAS Studio: A Tool for Simulating, Benchmarking, and Governing Human-AI Work Allocation,” evidence record 4076, https://ethics.ai/record/4076 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.