Jurisdiction over Ubiquitous Copyright Infringements: Should Right-Holders Be Allowed to Sue at Home?
The Internet, and more recently cloud computing, has transformed the technological, economic, social, and cultural conditions under which intellectual property rights are exploited. These developments also challenge traditional rules of private international law, particularly rules governing international jurisdiction. This paper examines when courts should assert jurisdiction over cross-border copyright disputes arising in cloud-based environments. It focuses on the risks faced by right holders
Record details
Published: 17 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Copyright & IP · Environment
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Ed Husic says weakening copyright to benefit AI companies would betray Labor party’s ethos
The Guardian · 14 July 2026
SkillsVote: Lifecycle Governance of Agent Skills from Collection, Recommendation to Evolution
arXiv · 18 May 2026
HAAS Studio: A Tool for Simulating, Benchmarking, and Governing Human-AI Work Allocation
arXiv · 18 May 2026
ROAD: Adaptive Data Mixing for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning via Bi-Level Optimization
arXiv · 14 May 2026
CR4T: Rewrite-Based Guardrails for Adolescent LLM Safety
arXiv · 20 May 2026
From Licensing to Open Access: Designing a Sustainable Transition in Operational Weather Data
arXiv · 20 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (17 May 2026), “Jurisdiction over Ubiquitous Copyright Infringements: Should Right-Holders Be Allowed to Sue at Home?,” evidence record 4197, https://ethics.ai/record/4197 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.