AVSD: Adaptive-View Self-Distillation by Balancing Consensus and Teacher-Specific Privileged Signals
Self-distillation enables language models to learn on-policy from their own trajectories by using the same model as both student and teacher, with the teacher being conditioned on privileged information unavailable to the student. Such information can come in different types or views, such as solutions, demonstrations, feedback, or final answers. This setup provides dense token-level feedback without relying on a separate external model, but creates a fundamental asymmetry: the teacher may rely
Record details
Published: 20 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Knowing the Rules Is Not Enough: Student Regulatory Awareness and Use of GenAI in Higher Education
arXiv · 16 May 2026
Generative AI as a Design Variable: An Evidence-Centered Framework for Principled Governance in STEM Assessment
arXiv · 24 May 2026
Eskwai for Students: Generative AI Assistant for Legal Education in Ghana
arXiv · 14 May 2026
Less is More: Early Stopping Rollout for On-Policy Distillation
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Counteraction-Aware Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation for General Capability Recovery with Domain Preservation
arXiv · 26 May 2026
BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law
arXiv · 27 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (20 May 2026), “AVSD: Adaptive-View Self-Distillation by Balancing Consensus and Teacher-Specific Privileged Signals,” evidence record 3991, https://ethics.ai/record/3991 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.