Generative AI as a Design Variable: An Evidence-Centered Framework for Principled Governance in STEM Assessment
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) presents a governance challenge for STEM assessment. Unrestricted GenAI access enables task outsourcing that undermines the validity of traditional assessments; blanket prohibitions are difficult to enforce, may push use underground, and do little to prepare students for workplaces where GenAI-supported workflows are increasingly common. This paper addresses this dilemma by proposing a framework grounded in Evidence-Centered Design (ECD) that treats Gen
Record details
Published: 24 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Children & education
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Less is More: Early Stopping Rollout for On-Policy Distillation
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Counteraction-Aware Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation for General Capability Recovery with Domain Preservation
arXiv · 26 May 2026
BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law
arXiv · 27 May 2026
ADWIN: Adaptive Windows for Horizon-Aware On-Policy Distillation
arXiv · 27 May 2026
AVSD: Adaptive-View Self-Distillation by Balancing Consensus and Teacher-Specific Privileged Signals
arXiv · 20 May 2026
AI Sovereignty as National Learning Capacity: A Human-Centered Learning Mechanics Viewpoint on France, the United States, and China
arXiv · 30 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (24 May 2026), “Generative AI as a Design Variable: An Evidence-Centered Framework for Principled Governance in STEM Assessment,” evidence record 3793, https://ethics.ai/record/3793 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.