Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Modeling for Measurement and Network Analysis of the Data Service Market
With the increasing complexity of collaboration among various social entities and user demands, the factors affecting the stable development of the data service market are also growing. These factors include the widespread dissemination of information enhancing subjective consciousness, the continuous improvement in intelligence, and the complexification of structural relationships. To achieve effective governance and regulation of the data service market, it is crucial to conduct simulation exp
Record details
Published: 22 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Regulation · Agents & autonomy
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
One Policy, Infinite NPCs: Persona-Traceable Shared RL Policies for Scalable Game Agents
arXiv · 22 May 2026
Infra-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Agents Outperform Classical RL For Worst-Case Robustness
arXiv · 22 May 2026
From Frontier to Shadow AI: A Simmering Threat to Assurance and Security in Critical Infrastructure
arXiv · 23 May 2026
Efficient Agentic Reasoning Through Self-Regulated Simulative Planning
arXiv · 21 May 2026
From Replacement to Orchestration: A Socio-Technical Architecture for Agentic AI in Corporate R&D
arXiv · 23 May 2026
AOP-Wiki EMOD 3.0: Data Model Expansions and Content Evaluation Framework for Using Agentic AI to Improve Integration between AOPs and New Approach Methodologies (NAMs)
arXiv · 20 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 May 2026), “Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Modeling for Measurement and Network Analysis of the Data Service Market,” evidence record 3874, https://ethics.ai/record/3874 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.