Representation Alignment Rests on Linear Structure
We investigate the Platonic Representation Hypothesis (PRH) through a tripartite statistical framework of representations: signal, bias, and noise. {1) Signal:} We propose that Platonic alignment arises from the universal relationship between objects and attributes, which is encoded linearly in representations according to the Linear Representation Hypothesis (LRH). We provide evidence that LRH helps explain PRH by extracting linear object-attribute features with sparse autoencoders and showing
Record details
Published: 22 May 2026
Source: arXiv
Category: Research
Topics: Bias & fairness · Safety & alignment · Finance, VC & PE
Retrieved: 14 July 2026
Related evidence
These records share source-supplied organisations, an exact publisher byline, automatic topics or regions. The reason is shown on every link; related does not mean supporting, agreeing with or verifying this record.
Algorithmic Fragility and Persona Bias in LLM-Generated Autistic Communication
arXiv · 26 May 2026
Quality-Conditioned Agreement in Automated Short Answer Scoring: Mid-Range Degradation and the Impact of Task-Specific Adaptation
arXiv · 8 May 2026
Can Persona-Prompted LLMs Emulate Subgroup Values? An Empirical Analysis of Generalisability and Fairness in Cultural Alignment
arXiv · 14 April 2026
The Geometric Inductive Bias of Grokking: Bypassing Phase Transitions via Architectural Topology
arXiv · 5 March 2026
Beyond Binary Edits Robust Multimodal Knowledge Editing with Adversarial Subspace Alignment
arXiv · 22 May 2026
Not Too Generative, Not Too Discriminative: The Human Alignment Sweet Spot
arXiv · 22 May 2026
How to cite this record
ethics.ai (22 May 2026), “Representation Alignment Rests on Linear Structure,” evidence record 3864, https://ethics.ai/record/3864 (originally published by arXiv).
Use and limitations
This page is a stable index and citation surface for a source record. ethics.ai did not author the underlying report and has not independently verified every claim. Automatic topics may be imperfect. For consequential use, quote and cite the original publisher.